PhysioNet/CinC Challenges

Logo

Quick links for this year's Challenge:

Please post questions and comments in the forum. However, if your question reveals information about your entry, then please email challenge at physionet.org. We may post parts of our reply publicly if we feel that all Challengers should benefit from it. We will not answer emails about the Challenge to any other address.

PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2021 Results

This page contains the final scores for the 2021 PhysioNet/CinC Challenge:

These tables contain scores for the 12-lead, 6-lead, 4-lead, 3-lead, and 2-lead versions of the hidden validation and test sets. The 2021 Challenge webpage and 2021 Challenge paper describes the lead combinations and the validation and test data sources. We also included an all-lead score in the tables, which is computed as the mean of the 12-lead, 3-lead, and 2-lead scores.

We used the Challenge scoring metric that we implemented in the evaluation code repository to rank the official entries on the test set. We sorted the unofficial entries alphabetically by team name.

In these tables, you can find the following information:

To refer to these tables in your publication, please cite the following papers:

Perez Alday EA, Gu A, Shah AJ, Robichaux C, Wong AI, Liu C, Liu F, Rad AB, Elola A, Seyedi S, Li Q, Sharma A, Clifford GD*, Reyna MA*. Classification of 12-lead ECGs: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2020. Physiol Meas. 41 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/abc960.

Reyna MA, Sadr N, Perez Alday EA, Gu A, Shah AJ, Robichaux C, Rad AB, Elola A, Seyedi S, Ansari S, Ghanbari H, Li Q, Sharma A, Clifford GD. Will Two Do? Varying Dimensions in Electrocardiography: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2021. Computing in Cardiology 2021; 48: 1-4.


Supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) under NIH grant R01EB030362.

Back